Skip to content
NewNew models in the catalogue
Musevate
Comparison

Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Seedance 2.0

Almost every comparison of Grok Imagine 1.5 and Seedance 2.0 on the internet is written from two launch announcements. This one is written from our catalogue: the specifications below are the records the studio sells from, read when the page is served, so they cannot go stale. Neither model has a clip of ours on this page yet. Nothing here is taken from either vendor’s reel, which is always the best of many attempts.

Grok Imagine 1.5 costs 20 credits for five seconds against 55 for Seedance 2.0 — 2.8 times the price for the same length, which is the difference you will feel first if you iterate on a prompt.

Both generate their own sound, so neither needs a track laid over it afterwards.

Grok Imagine 1.5 tops out at 1080p and Seedance 2.0 at 4K.

Neither is declared the winner anywhere on this page. Where a row has a better answer — a lower price, a longer clip, a larger render — it is marked, and the rest is left unmarked, because sound, mode support and the look of the output are differences rather than rankings.

Specifications read from the Musevate catalogue when this page loaded. Neither model has a clip of ours on this page yet.

Side by side

Every figure here is read from our catalogue — the records the studio sells from — when the page is served, so it cannot drift the way a written comparison does. Where a row has a better answer it is marked; where it does not, both are shown plainly rather than scored.

Grok Imagine 1.5 compared with Seedance 2.0, from the live model registry
 Grok Imagine 1.5Seedance 2.0
Price for a 5 second clip20 credits at 720p55 credits at 720p
Longest clip15 seconds15 seconds
Highest resolution1080p4K
Generates soundAlways, as part of the generationOn request, with audio switched on
Text to videoYesYes
Animates an image you uploadYesYes
Takes reference imagesNoYes, at 75 credits for 5 seconds at 720p
Example generated on MusevateNot yetNot yet

Prices are credits for a five second clip at 720p. Grok Imagine 1.5 and Seedance 2.0 each have a full page with the rest of their specification.

Questions

Should I use Grok Imagine 1.5 or Seedance 2.0?

It depends on the shot, and any page answering that without knowing what you are making is guessing. The honest way to choose is to run the same prompt through both — on Musevate that is two generations from one balance. The differences above are the ones worth deciding on before you spend anything.

Is Seedance 2.0 worth the extra over Grok Imagine 1.5?

Seedance 2.0 costs 55 credits for five seconds against 20 for Grok Imagine 1.5 at 720p. Whether that buys you anything depends entirely on the shot: on some prompts the difference is obvious and on others it is invisible.

Do I have to choose one on Musevate?

No. Both are in the same catalogue on the same balance, and the router will pick between them for you if you would rather describe the shot than the model. Picking by hand is there when you want it and never required.

Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine 1.5 or Seedance 2.0?

Grok Imagine 1.5, at 20 credits for a five second clip at 720p against 55 for Seedance 2.0. Both are billed the same way and the studio quotes the exact figure before you spend anything.

Which makes longer clips, Grok Imagine 1.5 or Seedance 2.0?

Both accept up to 15 seconds in one generation.

Do Grok Imagine 1.5 and Seedance 2.0 generate sound?

Both do. Grok Imagine 1.5: always, as part of the generation. Seedance 2.0: on request.

Can I use both Grok Imagine 1.5 and Seedance 2.0 on one account?

Yes. Musevate is one account and one credit balance across every model, so comparing them costs nothing beyond the two generations.

Run the comparison yourself

Both models are on one account with one balance. Grok Imagine 1.5 is 20 credits for five seconds at 720p; Seedance 2.0 is 55.

Create your first video
Grok Imagine 1.5 vs Seedance 2.0 · Musevate